1 00:00:00,500 --> 00:00:05,220 [ Music ] 2 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:12,800 [ Background Noise ] 3 00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:50,560 >>Test 1. 4 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:56,840 >>I think that's good Natalie, let it go. 5 00:00:56,850 --> 00:01:01,269 >>This is the last test of the X-56A that we're doing in the Loads Lab and we are doing a 6 00:01:01,269 --> 00:01:04,890 Swing Test, which is to determine the Moment of Inertia of the vehicle. 7 00:01:04,890 --> 00:01:09,110 Moment of Inertia, you can think of that as angular momentum, how hard or easy is it for 8 00:01:09,110 --> 00:01:10,860 the vehicle to pitch up and down. 9 00:01:10,860 --> 00:01:15,040 So when it's flying in the air, you want to determine 'Ok, if we deflect the control surface 10 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:19,770 a few degrees, is it going to rotate sharply down, or rotate sharply up? 11 00:01:19,770 --> 00:01:24,290 Or how much force do we need to apply while it's flying to make sure that we really understand 12 00:01:24,290 --> 00:01:26,290 the flight dynamics of the vehicle?' 13 00:01:26,290 --> 00:01:31,590 It's currently configured right now in what we call the IYY, or pitch, inertia, so you 14 00:01:31,590 --> 00:01:35,560 can see it's swinging about the fore and aft of the vehicle, and this is the configuration 15 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:38,510 we're most concerned about to determine this information experimentally. 16 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:44,760 >>Test number 4, Natalie, go ahead, swing. 17 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:50,200 [ Music ] 18 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,800 Ok, let it go Natalie. 19 00:01:59,980 --> 00:02:02,180 >>IMU is go and recording. 20 00:02:02,820 --> 00:02:04,420 >>Tracker is recording. 21 00:02:06,140 --> 00:02:10,820 >>To determine this moment of inertia, we need to know what the weight of the vehicle is, 22 00:02:10,830 --> 00:02:16,530 the approximate CG location, and the period at which it is doing each oscillation. 23 00:02:16,530 --> 00:02:20,360 We measured a period using multiple different tools. 24 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:24,290 One of them was a simple stopwatch, so we're just counting the oscillation as it's going 25 00:02:24,290 --> 00:02:25,920 across the same position. 26 00:02:25,920 --> 00:02:29,770 We also have this laser tracker that is connected to a laser ball on the vehicle. 27 00:02:29,770 --> 00:02:32,900 We have an attached inertial measurement unit on the very back. 28 00:02:32,900 --> 00:02:36,190 We also have the onboard system measuring angular rates as well. 29 00:02:36,190 --> 00:02:40,840 So all these independent sets of data, we're essentially just trying to get period, but 30 00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:45,410 it's viable to have different sets of data so we can compare to make sure that we have 31 00:02:45,410 --> 00:02:47,220 the best information possible. 32 00:02:47,220 --> 00:02:51,030 So we'll compare the accuracy of the laser tracker, the IMU, the onboard systems, even 33 00:02:51,030 --> 00:02:57,940 the stopwatch, just as a checking measure, to make sure our data is correct. 34 00:02:57,940 --> 00:03:02,030 We test in two different lengths, the lengths, you can see those hangar plates which is connecting 35 00:03:02,030 --> 00:03:06,820 between the pivot and the vehicle, what this helps us do is allow us to obtain two independent 36 00:03:06,820 --> 00:03:07,820 sets of data. 37 00:03:07,820 --> 00:03:12,130 It's essentially two independent tests we can do for not a lot more work, to get some 38 00:03:12,130 --> 00:03:15,050 good data to work with. 39 00:03:15,050 --> 00:03:19,830 After we wrap up and bring the test article back down, we're gonna analyze the data to 40 00:03:19,830 --> 00:03:25,360 make sure that we have all of our period information accurately, make sure we calculate our CG 41 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,380 location accurately, and we accounted for all the weights. 42 00:03:28,380 --> 00:03:33,260 And once we do this analysis, we'll hand over the information to update our finite element